Conversations -

Questions, Answers, Observations, and a few Kudos

 

Continued

 

Correspondence from 2002 - Page: 1 2(begins below) 3

Correspondence from 2003 - Page: 1 2 3 4

Correspondence from 2004 - Page: 1


Correspondence from 2002

Page: 2



Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2002
Subject: website

Dear Mr. Crews---

I read through your website and found it very interesting. I hope you won't delete my letter right away. I am a believer, but am fascinated by those who say they are "ex-christians". I find it fascinating because the concept of believeing and then not believing seems impossible to me. I know that I once believed in Santa Claus and then accepted that he was a fairy tale. But what makes it so impossible to "not" believe in God is the answers that have actually come from prayers. 2 of the answers were so clear that when I think of not believing I feel it would be impossible unless I completely blocked those events from my mind and stubbornly refused to acknowledge that they had happened. I've tried not to believe in the past, when I was angry with God for some reason, like a stubborn child says "I don't love you any more!!" to their mother. But they don't really mean it because the love-bond is too great. the same has happened to me. I cannot continue in my quest, because I remember who God is and what he has done for me. I just wanted to share that with you, because you speak of "divorcing" God---but are you sure that God has "divorced" you? Thanks for listening.

J


David's Response:

Hi J,
Thanks for writing. I never mind having a discussion with people who are interested in reasoning and finding out things. The things you say and your interest in learning about people who have been through the "deconversion" process is indicitave of someone who is willing to consider and listen to differing viewpoints.

One thing I have learned over the years is that no one can gainsay anyone else who claims to have had a personal "mystical" or "miraculous" experience. I was raised in a sect of Christianity that did not acknowledge spiritual gifts or powers in today's world, and I often had to listen to others tell me, "but I saw it," or, "this happened to me and I know it was real" when relating such things as healings or life events that seemed a specific answer to specific prayers. I don't know what your experience was, but regardless, I would never be able to say to you that you should not acknowledge it as real. What I might suggest is that when those of us who were raised in a Christian culture do experience those kinds of things, we immediately and automatically interpret them in the context of the Christian worldview - that is, "Jehovah/Abba Father God, or Jesus, listened to my prayer and answered it in this way." What dawned on me in my reconsideration of religion is that we have no way to justify imposing our Christian view on such mystical events with any more authority than the Hindus or the Zoarastrians, or the curanderos and shamans of Brazil or Siberia have to impose their views. The fact is, we humans do not know who or what or how these things happen, but if I believe in the Christian God, I will naturally and perhaps emphatically interpret it in that way.

For me, aside from personal "mystical" or subjective experiences that cannot be scientifically proven or explained, there is simply no other empirical evidence for the existence of the kind of God portrayed in the Judeo/Christian scriptures. That vision of God is not even self-consistent and much wrangling has been done over the years by many thousands of believers, myself emphatically included, to try to get the biblical God to be consistent and to make religious sense. The only way I could do it was to make God and his dealings with us be completely "spiritual" and not to allow him to have interaction with us in this physical world (thus alleviating the problem of no empirical evidence for his existence). That view can work as a way of interpreting the Bible (and clears up a lot of questions about things like Revelation, btw), but essentially leaves one with nothing to "hang one's hat upon".

The idea of the stubborn child saying "I don't love you!" when he really does, is not the same kind of manifestation of disbelief that occurs for "ex-Christians". It's straining the analogy, perhaps, but it would be like the child suddenly finding out that his Mom and Dad were not actually real people, but were projected holograms and that he was being raised in a constructed world whose makers and operators were completely unknown and at least so far, unknowable. That is more what it was like for me -- God is seen to be a construct planted in my mind by the human society I was raised in and reinforced by "sacred" documents that seemed untouchable in their authority. Now, I realize that that document is not original and not nearly as old as other documents from which it obviously borrowed, and that the view of God presented is only the latest in a long panoply of such gods. Also, many of the fundamental concepts that we consider original to Christianity are simply not.

You asked if I was sure God has really divorced me. The way I addressed that issue in the essay is, of course, an analogy or figure of speech. It only feels like a divorce, because it is as good as one to me, the human being. It is not actually a divorce, of course, because there was never a second party! It is actually more like the schizophrenic who begins to understand that a person he sees and talks to is not a real person, but only someone he has created in his mind. That manifestation, though, has been so powerfully projected, that he cannot distinguish it from a real person. Now, I can make that distinction, and once made, it is no longer possible to take that person (God in this case) seriously as I once did.

Does that mean I discount all possibilities for God or a God or Gods to exist? No, but when one is burned at the stove, one becomes much more cautious. I demand real, empirical proof for such an extraordinary claim. No such proofs have ever, in all the history of humankind, been forthcoming, and I do not intend to hold my breath for one now, but I shall keep an open mind to all new ideas and experiences along the way.

Well, I hope that was not too long an answer to your questions and comments, and I hope you will find it useful in some way. I will never tell or advise anyone to believe or not to believe. My only passion is for what is true, and I will pursue what is true even if it leads me into frightening places (and it has at times). If your passion for what is true outweighs your passion to believe at any cost, you may also find yourself on the path to jarring, upsetting, vastly enlightening, outrageously joyous, and fulfilling knowledge. I wish you well.

Regards,
David Crews


Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002
Subject: re[2]: website

David----
Thank you for your very friendly response to my query concerning your
"deconversion". It appears you have put a lot of thought into your de-
cision, rather than a "knee-jerk" reaction to some negative happening in
your life. I have found that many atheists, when the intellectual cover is
lowered, really have some anger issue at the bottom of their decision to
not believe in God. I don't blame them though, losing someone close to you
could cause one to say "There cannot be a God, and even if there was one
I would hate him". I have also noticed that many atheists will say they don't
believe in God because of some horrible thing that happened to them at the
hands of "believers". I can understand this too, but I usually try to point out
that you can't call FORD a horrible automoblie just because some Ford sales-
man turned you off. Believers CAN be horrible people. I lived in a strict "cult-
like" group of Christians, filled with legalism and hypocrisy and went through
a small Hell on earth due to the experiences there. But once I left that group,
I again realized that they didn't represent God--that God was someone entirely
different. I had let men "representing" God literally run my life for 4 years. But this
did not make me disbelieve, it simply opened up my eyes and made me better
realize how God deals with each of us as "individuals", not corporate groups of
people under some authoritative structure. I wanted to mention to you too that
the answers to prayers I spoke of were not necessarily miracles that happened
in one moment of time, but were answers that came over time. They were things
that I had yearned for and had prayed with real sincerity to the point of tears to
God. One day I looked back and had what I had prayed for and realized that God
had indeed answered my prayers, but not in the time period I had desired at the
time. I wanted it "now" and because it didn't happen "now" I thought he had not
heard or answered. I believe this happens to many people----they say "God does
not answers prayers, it's futile". But that is because they want to be God and answer
the prayers themselves, and in their way. I always remember Elijah in the Bible(I'll
try not to preach) when he saw God---it says that first there was lightning and thunder
and a tornado and massive noise but it was all followed by "a still small voice". I've
noticed in my life God works that way--the things that REALLY matter seem to come
about very quietly and in a way almost unoticeable. Sometimes I have to look and
remember how I had prayed for those things and they had indeed come to pass. I don't
mean to preach David, I guess I'm just expressing what I believe. I truly respect you
for being honest and open about your "deconversion" and the last thing I would
want to do is to condemn you. I'm glad you said you have left the door open to belief--
although I realize you want physical and empirical prrof of existence. All the best
to you and thanks for replying to my E-mail.

Sincerely, J


David's Response:

Hi J ,

Thanks for the accurate assessment of my situation as carefully thought out and not an emotional reaction of some kind. I agree that many atheists hold their philosophy from having some level of that kind of "knee-jerk" response you were talking about. I do not even consider myself an "atheist", but rather consider that the rational view of things is the natural default stance, which includes atheist views as well as agnostic ones. Some folks become tribal about their "atheism" as if it were another religion. I would like to believe that most real thinking unbelievers understand that it is a stance, alterable at any time by the introduction of new evidence and proofs for something more.

I do understand your position completely, though, having lived it for most of my life. Now, I just find the connection lacking for proof that the good or asked-for things in life are the result of some outside agency, especially in the face of all I have learned in the last few years concerning the true history of mankind and the history and origins of religion.
Thanks again, J, and write anytime.

David


Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2002
Subject: Can we talk?

Dear David,

I have just discovered your website today. It is a difficult time in my life right now.

I lived in Israel for a few years and have returned to the states. I have had a less than hero's welcome.
When I was abroad, I felt I really came into who I am. I was so happy. I discovered all kinds of truths while in Jerusalem. However, none of them were favorable to Christianity or the basis of any religion. I saw how paganism is still such a part of christianity.

Whenever I tried to share the things I was learning with friends, (while overseas), I was cursed....my
church cut me off and Christian friends disowned me. Needless to say, I do not volunteer what I have
learned unless someone wants to know.

I feel so alone in my small town. I have very few friends here now. I have changed...but they have not.
Some days I am so very depressed and do not know how to rise above.

I took great sacrifice to live overseas. The experience gave me what the church would not or could not do - give me mature character in not judging others who do not believe as I did and to go beyond the boundaries of man made dogmas and doctrines. The is a wonder big life out there for anyone who takes the courageous step to find it.

SO - that was my homecoming, now what?
How do I live in the US without friends or "beliefs"?
I look forward to your comments.

sincerely,
JD


David's Response:

Dear JD,

Thank you for your heartfelt email. I know that the transition out of traditional Christian belief and society can be traumatic for many people, especially if one has been involved in a close "family" church whose members have no intention of changing with you when you decide to grow. I have been fortunate , in that I have removed myself from my former believer groups slowly over many years, even while still a believer. My Christian beliefs became so unconventional that I was ostracized even as a believer, but now, of couse, none of my former group would have any "fellowship" with me. That's ok, since I drifted naturally away from them.

Your situation seems more acute, as the change has come quickly and your believing friends are still there and still involved with your personal culture and emotional life. That's much harder, because it comes at you like an unexpected divorce. I won't belittle the pain of that situation or its impact. I will tell you that there is a better world on the other side of the tunnel. There are many, many who have been down this road as well, and who would welcome your friendship and honor your knowledge and attitudes toward knowledge. You said you are in a small town, and that poses problems for "in-person" friends, but now we have the internet, and I encourage you to continue to explore the amazing resources that are available for ex-believers and non-believers on the web. There are communities of people who have or are going through just what you have, and there are many informational resources, as well. I'll give you a link to begin with below, and be sure to check out my links page for more. The best solution for feeling depressed and alone is to find others with similar experience and outlook and talk to them! You won't be alone for long.

My difficult experience was not in leaving a family of people, but in leaving my beliefs themselves, and that is the focus of most of my web site. It sounds like you found that path to knowledge in Israel and were able to follow it well. I can understand how removing oneself from your religious and social surroundings and moving into a vastly different one like that could be a catalyst to understanding and pursuing truth. I, too, am aware and amazed at the proliferation of pagan elements and concepts in Christianity. The old "mystery schools" were never completely supressed, but, like much else, were taken in and recast in Christian form. Much of what Paul teaches in his letters is actually gnostic in nature, even though he has been "revised" to appear to be anti-gnostic, etc.

There is an old saying, that it "is lonely at the top." In some ways, that applies to those of us who have the courage and interest to pursue truth and find ourselves with fewer and fewer companions on that journey. Most drop away and leave you to your doings. You are correct in saying that those who really want to know are not common. Thanks to the internet, now, though, I think you will find that those of us who have ascended and found ourselves lonely can actually come into contact even though we are not close geographically. This is a powerful thing and has already begun to change the world in many unforseen ways. How do we live without our friends or beliefs? We make new friends and cultivate the power of the search for truth and knowledge. It is not the closing of a book, but the opening of a new, unrevealed library. The exhilaration of new knowledge and understandings and exuberance of life one has when one is really living in the present moment, is a way of living that is priceless. Depression and dissappointment cannot flourish under such joy and power!

I wish you the best in your journey, and feel free to write anytime.
----
Check out this forum, then post a message. I think you will find some very sympathetic folks there!
http://pub76.ezboard.com/finlakeshfrm6

Best regards,
David



Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2002
Subject: Great!

I am in a similar state. My only problem is I haven't "come out".
I need the right time to tell my wife or maybe not.

D

David's Response:

Hi D,

Thanks for the email. Yeah, that's tough. I'm still trying to find the right way to tell certain members of my family who don't know my position fully. I am very fortunate to have a spouse who is parallel with me on this.

You may already be aware of it, but there is a pretty good article on the Am. Athiest site about "coming out" that you might want to read. Here's the link:

http://www.atheists.org/comingout/othercloset.html

Thanks again for writing - write anytime.

Regards,
David



Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2002
Subject: kindred spirit

Hi David,

Thanks for your web site. I enjoyed reading through it very much. I wonder
why I never looked for information like this on the web before? Maybe
because I was so busy searching my own heart and mind for the truth as I've
come to understand it.

I too left my Christian community and know the pain as well as the joy in
leaving one's religious community. My journey has changed my life so much
that I'm almost unrecognizable as a result.

In my attempts to understand my faith and the community that that faith
created I began to write. I've been writing for nearly three years now and
have finally put something together that I want to share with others. I'd
especially like to get your feedback if you get the chance to look at my
work. [URL given for personal site]

Thanks again for putting so much energy and thoughtfulness into a subject
matter so dear to my heart.

Sincerely,
BB

David's Response:

Hi BB,

Thanks for your kind letter. I really appreciate hearing from those who find my site of some value. I was able to read quite a lot of your site, and it sounds like you have made some of the same kind of shifts I began to make not long ago. I particularly liked how you said:

> Now I understand what it means to be born-again. Now my own conscience is my guide.

It really is like being born again, but in a wholesome but scary self-responsible manner, isn't it? Now, we only have our own intelligence and resources to make our way forward in the world, and for trying to understand the universe we are a part of. For me, that is just fine, and has engendered an exciting journey of research and new understandings about the history of mankind and of his religions. I always thought I was a very well-read, even scholarly Christian man, but I had no idea how "provincial" my understandings and knowledge base was until after I was able to get outside the Christian "box" and look around.

I thought the best part of your writings was the story of the neighbors with their tracts and their embarrasment. You have some good thoughts there on the psychology of religious people and the effects of the dominator power structure that would lead them to act and to react in that manner.
Good point, too, about the crucifix. I have often thought, even before leaving my religious beliefs, that a Roman execution device was an abominable symbol to be using for our churches. I love the idea of having an electric chair on the rooftops! :()

I'm glad that you had the courage to make the shift to a self-defined life and to speak up about it. The world of sheep needs to hear more about being empowered to think for themselves and to be told, perhaps for the first time, that they won't be punished for doing so. We should, however, be honest with them and speak plainly that this road is, as you put it, "difficult, lonely, and eye-opening." It is also uniquely satisfying, rewarding, and, after the initial culture shock has subsided, extremely gratifying and joyful! There is, indeed, much more to learn. I am thrilled to be on that road instead of one where I'm stuck trying to rationalize the Christian scriptures with real life.

We are all our own masters now, and the poignancy and power of the present moment is a force that can inspire us and lead us to all the best in works and life that mankind is capable of.

I wish you well in your journey, BB. Feel free to write anytime.

Regards,
David



Date:Tuesday, July 23, 2002

Dear David,

Thanks for getting back to me so quickly. I can't quite describe the feeling of having someone taking the time to read my stuff and quote it back in such a positive way. Just let me say thank you, it felt really good.

I've been so secluded in my writing with only very few people willing to read it and even fewer relating to my experiences. Often I've felt like the only person seeing the forest for the trees. Suffice to say I come from a very conservative and even more conflict avoidance background. What I'm doing in my spare time is not at all very well received.

But as I've been surfing the web lately I've been coming across what seems to be a relatively small community of "ex-christians." I have a feeling there are many more out there than the internet reflects. Have you read the study of the American Religious Identification Survey 2001?

http://www.gc.cuny.edu/studies/studies_index.htm#aris_1

It's an interesting read. According to the study in the last decade or so the number of ex-christians has doubled. I wonder what factors are contributing to these numbers? Maybe it's people like you at the grassroots level making a difference?
I'm very interested in meeting people who share in our experiences. Do they meet somewhere? I'm wondering if organizations like the Green party, or Atheists or Humanists share similar experiences? What about Unitarians? Personally, I hesitate to don any new label. I'm happy to just be a human being for now. I'm also interested in positive reputable publications that might be interested in my work. If I might be so bold to ask, do you know of any?

By the way, if it's not to personal, what do you do for a living now? And if I may, how has your conversion to rational thinking versus religious thinking changed your line of work, if any?

Well, thanks again for your correspondence.

Sincerely,
BB

David's Response:

Hi BB,

I think it is less likely to find a group or groups of people who have a rationalist viewpoint than to find those who will rally around a particular religious belief or creed. This is simply because the rationalistic, freethinking, nominally atheistic stance (and it is a stance rather than a dogma) is open in nature and does not "demand" any particular belief or set of beliefs or expected actions. Everyone has a different viewing angle, as it were, and there is less need or compulsion to "gather together". For those of us who were raised up in churches, that can be a bit disconcerting, no? I and my wife surely felt it. We decided to check out the Ethical Society, which is a group espousing "secular religion". It was quite interesting, and seemed to me to be a construct specifically designed by and for those who have left religious belief, but who still yearn for the trappings of religion and the comraderie of the group or congregation. Nothing wrong with that, of course, but it did seem to us to be a bit too much like they were trying to hang on to the very things that came out of the dogmatic religious system that we now wish to avoid.

So, we have not really found anything here - even in as forward thinking a place as Austin - that we feel is good for us to be involved in as opposed to just doing our own thing, and for me, finding my comraderie in the virtual world of the internet. Thus my web site. BTW, I have not yet gotten involved with the very strong Austin Atheist group here, although I know some of the people in it and have been around some of it for years. Madeline Murray-O'Hair and her family used to come into the TV studio where I work (more on that later), and do their television show every month. Again, though, it seems to me that Atheists (with a capital A) are rallying around non-belief as in yet another dogma or camp to be defended and from which to throw stones at all perceived enemies. Although I agree with much of their position on things, I don't want to adopt yet another creed. Like you, I am very happy to be "just a human being"!!

You asked where I work, and I alluded to the TV studio- I am Senior Producer/Director for Time Warner Cable here in Austin, where I create mostly commercials for local, regional, and some national spots. I specialize in editing, motion graphics, and animation. You can see stuff about me and stuff I've done at my other web sites, all of which can be accessed at http://www.newrational.com

My Digital Artist site has most of my commercial work, but you might find my other sites interesting as well. Let me know what you think!

Due, I suppose, to the nature of my work, my philosophical stance has never had an impact on it, nor the other way around. I did do some program work years ago to counter the Atheist show, before my paradigm shift, of course, but the nice thing about TV production is that no one cares what you believe or what you really do in life, and no one ever gets hurt. It's just television! :)

I can't really give you much on the book publishing. It is a nasty business and the only way to do anything like your writing is to self publish and self market. I know, because I wrote a book on the New Testament (a 400 page interpretation and study with over 1,000 scripture references in it) and self published it in 1994. It was a small run of about 500, and I did manage to sell out - mainly by attending a conference where I met the publisher of Great Christian Books. He bought most of my stock and through them, my book did end up in places all over the planet. But, it is not easy and nothing is guaranteed or even likely. I had a huge learning curve to deal with all the various aspects of creating a publishing company and a real book from scratch. It literally took years.

I do think that your sources about the increase in ex-christians is correct, and I think the proliferation of mass communications and the failure of the church systems to address morals these days has allowed many to reconsider things. I hope it continues, but we live in a world that could turn narrow and fundamentalist very quickly and very nastily, I am afraid. Humans are easily scared and cowed into submission and we live only a thin barrier of intellectualism away from barbarism. I hope that technology will provide some tools to mitigate this in the future, but I am trying to live each day to the fullest right now.

Best regards,
David



Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2002
Subject: thin barrier

Dear David,

I have to agree with you on many points. I think my desire for community is
the driving force behind wanting to find people of like mind. But really,
what's the difference between that desire and the desire of a religious
believer? I've come to the conclusion that the end result of belonging to a
religious community is driven by the strong desire to belong to something,
sometimes anything. Not that's there's anything wrong with that in itself,
but the results speak for themselves.

I enjoyed visiting your websites. You've obviously put a great deal of
effort into a wide variety of expression. In my former life I worked for
Apple Computer. I was part of the educational division that provided
computers for schools. It's amazing to see how people, like you, are using
these technology and how varied and powerful these technology really are. I
too hope technologies, that make it easier and easier to communicate the
creativity of the human spirit, makes a difference in our future. But I
agree there is a thin barrier between intellectualism and barbarism. I
doubt it's much more obvious than what's going on in our world today.

Thanks for your input on the publishing world. I have a stack of rejection
letters that emphasize your point.
....
It's weird because I realize I have still much more to learn. At twenty I
thought I knew so much. As I approach forty I realize that I know very
little at the same time know considerably more that I did before. It's a
strange and humbling feeling
.....

take care,
BB



Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2002
Subject: One reason

Hi David,

If you were to give the best reason for your leaving Christianity, what
would that be?

I look forward to your response.

K

David's Response:

Hi K,

The most compelling reason for my "deconversion" from Christianity was the deconstruction of the authority of the Bible scriptures. My default position as a believer was that the Bible was the unassailable source and authority for all things human. My studies in the last few years have shown me that the Bible is rather a latecomer in the world of holy scriptures, and is very, very derivative of older religions and their scriptures. There is tremedous influence of the Zoarastrian religion and the gnosis of the Mystery Schools of Greece and Egypt, and even further back to direct influences from the Aryan Vedic religions of India and the Dravidic beliefs that preceded that - going off into the mists of ancient time. I truly had no idea of any of this history or of the power plays that went on in priestly (Old Testament) times until I began to study some things while "setting aside" my core beliefs. It was the overwhelming evidence of this study that convinced me that those beliefs belonged in a very small box which I am now much too "large" to enter and call home.

It is amazing how huge a structure has been built upon the foundation of the Bible writings. I've said that it is like an inverted pyramid with all it's weight of tradition, ritual, and power, resting and bearing down mercilessly on that apex called the Bible. If that pyramidion is ever disturbed or shown to be false, then the entire structure above comes crashing down or dissolves away, no matter how big it was, or how much of that structure was good sense or the works of good people. I myself spent many years of dedicated work to try to reinforce that foundation and wrote a book that influenced many people to understand a completely spiritualized interpretation of the New Testament. All that work was good work, but it simply does not matter anymore in terms of understanding the universe and Life, and must be put aside along with all the other structure that was constructed on the pyramid point.

I experienced an old truism in my journey - "be careful what you ask for, for you might get it." I had asked for truth at any cost, and that is what I have found, although it is certainly not what I expected. It is what I wanted, but it is far more wonderful, overwhelming, scary, and joyful than ever I imagined. It is a very good thing for me to have experienced, but I know that for many, perhaps most, this would be too unsettling to even consider.

Thanks for the question, and I hope the answer is of interest to you.

Regards,
David



Date: Sat, 3 Aug 2002
Subject: RE: One reason

David,

Thanks for your answer. Do you consider yourself an agnostic? Do you lean toward an evolutionistic approach to the origins of life or some supernatural process?

Thanks.

K

David's Response:

K,

I don't particularly like labels like "I'm an Agnostic" or "...Athiest", etc. I have been too much a part of labelling in the past and now wish to be simply human and openminded about things. I consider agnosticism and atheism to be useful "stances" to take when certain concepts come up, but, as I state in one of my essays, I do not wish to become caught up in another "structure of assertions". For me, a default position which I would rather refer to as rational or rationalism is where I find myself and that can include atheistic views, agnostic ("I don't know or can't know"-ism) views, or anything else as long as it leads to a rational evaluation of whatever is being discussed or presented. I do hold to the oft-stated maxim that extraordinary claims require extraordinary proofs.

As for the process of life, I think some of the basic understandings of evolution are plainly valid. I think life is an ultimate mystery in many ways, though, and I have read much ("Darwin's Black Box", and "The Cosmic Serpent" come to mind) that make me think and wonder about the design and intelligence elements that appear to be present in Life. I look forward eagerly to new research and information on this subject, but I will consider such data only as it comes through a rational process, not a simplistic religious one based on faith in the unseen.

David


Date: Sat, 3 Aug 2002
Subject: Austin Ishmael and Disillusionment

David,

cool site about disillusionment.

A book that i think you'd like after lookin at your site is Ishmael by Daniel Quinn. Are you familiar? No book has ever helped explain the roots of disillusionment in our culture to me more than that...well except Quinn's subsequent books :) There is a great site at http://www.readishmael.com that explains it, especially the Why Read Ishmael section.....

H

David's Response:

Hi H,

Thank you for the email. Yes, I am very familiar with Quinn's books (see references in my book list on my site). They were not the first things I read that began my journey out of Christianity, but they were absolutely pivotal in solidifying my understandings of the true history of mankind. I have always highly recommended them myself, especially Ishmael and The Story of B, to anyone who is beginning a study of these things. In fact, I keep an extra copy or two to hand out to friends!
....
The disillusionment I refer to in my site is a little different from the overview of "disillusioned culture" of Quinn's analysis. I'm referring more specifically to the positive disillusionment of someone coming out from under the influence of organized religion. This influence is, of course, a subset and side effect of the overall dominator or Taker culture.

Another book that gives much insight into the history of the dominator culture and how it has defined religion in our age, is called "Dancing Shadows", by Aoumiel. She is a Green Wiccan who has some wonderful history going back to the Aryan and Dravidic religions of India and how the Aryans promoted the dominator style. Or, if you want to really stretch your thinking, try "Food of the Gods" by Terrance McKenna for insights into how religion may have begun in the first place.

I'm happy you found my site and found it of interest. Write anytime.

Regards,
David




NEXT PAGE of Conversations

 

Correspondence from 2002 - Page: 1 2 3

Correspondence from 2003 - Page: 1 2 3 4

Correspondence from 2004 - Page: 1

 


The present moment is not mundane. It is, in essence, extraordinary. -DC
   
Comments or questions:
joy@newrational.com

 

Home | What This Site Is & Isn't | Joy of Disillusionment? | Just Like A Divorce | Parable of The Prosperous Son | Behold This Day | Contemplation of Annihilation | Consecration of Consciousness | Poems & Ponderings | Things to Read | Links | My Journey| Conversations